<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Redline Doc &#187; risk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://irv.ourexchange.net/tag/risk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://irv.ourexchange.net</link>
	<description>Technology changes, people stay the same.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 17:03:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Bonuses for bettors</title>
		<link>http://irv.ourexchange.net/2010/03/bonuses_for_bettors/</link>
		<comments>http://irv.ourexchange.net/2010/03/bonuses_for_bettors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 17:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>redlinedoc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[I never saw THAT coming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankrupt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business+ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[executive+compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fairness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiduciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[other+peoples+money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poor+insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poverty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vulnerable]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irv.ourexchange.net/?p=104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We lent trust and were returned fiduciary irresponsibility. 
Bonuses for bettors? ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been quiet again. Probably feeling a deep recession myself, much more moral than fiscal but none the less, staying away from vocalizing what should be said.</p>
<p>I awoke to a story this morning about Jeffrey Skilling. His lawyers want to revisit the case so poor Jeffrey, who ruined the lives not only of stockholders, but his fellow employees by lying and taking their monies would be set free. But I digress.</p>
<p>I work in Hartford, now ranked the third poorest city of its size in the nation.  Once it had a thriving downtown and people worked at department stores, in the pre-mall days, with names like G Fox and Company or Brown-Thompson and more. They probably never made much more than minimum wage but worked hard, many of them for 30 years or more and retired with small social security benefits but with a retirement plan that allowed them some leeway to visit grandchildren, keep an apartment or house and generally live a decent retired lifestyle. No high rollers here, just decent hardworking folks.</p>
<p>I spoke to one the other day, now on the verge of losing her house because she can&#8217;t make the tax payments. How? Well Jeffrey Skilling&#8217;s friends at Morgan Stanley and Lehman Brothers (and many others) took her monies to the racetrack, bet the monies on derrivatives (a fancy name for casino in the stock world).  So long as everyone was making 100% returns (you do see where this is going) everyone was happy. Then the day came when someone looked and (((GASP!!!))) the emperor was naked. The whole house of cards fell and with it the retirements and savings of the folks in the North End of Hartford and elsewhere. Oh well. Not to despair. We&#8217;re so good (the Skilling-ites replied) that we need bonuses to make sure that we retain all these fine young minds.  And so they did. We the people bonused the bettors. If they&#8217;d done this at a OTB window they could not have done a better job.</p>
<p>What of my lady in the North End. She, who worked all her life gets to go on assistance. She spoke with me with tears in her eyes.   She&#8217;d never taken anything from anyone and now she was forced to accept this.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not the blood thirsty sort; however, I have visions of letting Jeffrey or his ilk, loose in a field with some of the folks they fleeced. Heads on pikes. It might slow the cascade of betting other peoples monies. It might bring some cold comfort to those without heat or shelter because they lent trust and were returned fiduciary irresponsibility.</p>
<p>I spoke with a 401K counselor recently about all this stealing. He of course in his snow-cones-salesman&#8217;s way assured me that this could never happen to mutual funds? Huh?</p>
<p>Somewhere out there I recall that fiduciary meant fiscally responsible. If we bonus these people perhaps they should pay (directly) some of those millions to those they fleeced.  An idea but hardly likely to fly. Nope. Heads on pikes I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://irv.ourexchange.net/2010/03/bonuses_for_bettors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Turfed too</title>
		<link>http://irv.ourexchange.net/2009/08/turfed-too/</link>
		<comments>http://irv.ourexchange.net/2009/08/turfed-too/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 03:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>redlinedoc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Universal HealthCare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business+ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emergency room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health+insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poor+insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[turfed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[underinsurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[underinsured]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irv.ourexchange.net/?p=99</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It amazes me that in the land of the best healthcare we&#8217;re more in the business of denying care than providing it. I get a call the other day that a kid has stepped on a piece of glass. Its off hours but I say &#8220;sure, bring him in, I&#8217;ll take a look&#8221;. A pale [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It amazes me that in the land of<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/12/opinion/12sun1.html" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.nytimes.com/2007/08/12/opinion/12sun1.html?referer=');"> the best healthcare</a> we&#8217;re more in the business of denying care than providing it.</p>
<p>I get a call the other day that a kid has stepped on a piece of glass. Its off hours but I say &#8220;sure, bring him in, I&#8217;ll take a look&#8221;.</p>
<p>A pale frightened 13y/o arrives at the clinic with parents. Apparently yesterday he jumped up off a picnic table (in the way that 13 year old males do) and sprang directly onto a wine glass lying on the ground. The glass shattered into the bottom of his foot. The parents, correctly, take him to the nearest emergency room. He waits approximately 3 1/2 hours since its &#8220;only a bleeding foot&#8221;. Xrays show glass in the wound and the physician diagnoses tendon injuries to the tendons of the toes.  Ahh, you say, a case for the surgeons.</p>
<p>Not so fast. He has a state option child health insurance. They sew up the foot (with the glass inside) and direct him to a private practice clinic the following day. He continues to bleed, slowly, through the night. Mom and dad pack him off to the local recommended doctor only to find that he (nor most others) do not accept this insurance. They are tempted to return to the emergency room but call me.</p>
<p>He cannot  be treated here. He needs advanced care which we cannot offer to him. I make some calls with the assistance of our pediatrician. He&#8217;s transferred to a tertiary care facility. By 4PM he&#8217;s in an operating room and  being cared for.</p>
<p>What went wrong? Why didn&#8217;t the emergency room transfer him inter-hospital when they realized they had a severe injury they couldn&#8217;t handle? Why did they refer him through out patient when clearly there was no real outpatient option?</p>
<p>Insurance. When the insurance pays so poorly that even the most basic of services are covered but lose money, then the hospitals, left to chose to bleed monies or to restrict services chose the latter.  In the land of &#8216;the best healthcare&#8221; we are forced into rationing that healthcare based not on need, not on priorities but on the needs of the stockholders of insurance companies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://irv.ourexchange.net/2009/08/turfed-too/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Irony rides again</title>
		<link>http://irv.ourexchange.net/2009/08/irony-rides-again/</link>
		<comments>http://irv.ourexchange.net/2009/08/irony-rides-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 14:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>redlinedoc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[I never saw THAT coming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut River]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Floodplain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hartford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Irony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poverty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irv.ourexchange.net/?p=85</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve had a catbird seat for the construction of a new facility in the poor end of town where I work. Its a marvel of glass and concrete and steel and glass &#8211; oh I DID say glass. Indeed the glass rises nearly spire like to the roof at the front of this building. Wing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had a <a href="http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/87600.html" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/87600.html?referer=');">catbird seat </a>for the construction of a new facility in the poor end of town where I work. Its a marvel of glass and concrete and steel and glass &#8211; oh I DID say glass. Indeed the glass rises nearly spire like to the roof at the front of this building. Wing like, the roof soars. It is a beauty to behold. One of the many problems, probably not foreseen on this<a href="http://www.nature.org/wherewework/northamerica/.../connecticut/connecticutriver/" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.nature.org/wherewework/northamerica/.../connecticut/connecticutriver/?referer=');"> ancient floodplain </a>of a building site, is that water needs to go somewhere. Build a soaring roof and you have roaring drainage water.</p>
<p>The water comes off the roof so fast that it needs a cistern to slow the flow of the water. Cisterns were installed, thermos bottle looking affairs on concrete pads around the building. Voila, problem solved. Not so fast. The waters, not seen since the times of Noah, overwhelmed even this system digging up the ground. Solution: <a href="http://www.tennessee.gov/environment/wpc/sed_ero_controlhandbook/rr.pdf" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.tennessee.gov/environment/wpc/sed_ero_controlhandbook/rr.pdf?referer=');">Riprap,</a> stones to break up the water spilling from the cisterns from the roof. Ahh, architecture.</p>
<p>It is indeed a pretty solution, 4 to 4 1/2 inch <a href="http://www.wesleyan.edu/ctgeology/Traprock.PDF" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.wesleyan.edu/ctgeology/Traprock.PDF?referer=');">traprock</a>.  Traprock has an irregular shape with sharp edges and pointy parts. It doesn&#8217;t move much. However, it is also about softball sized and easy to fit in the hand. About now there should be a<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DXCbAtkgNMw" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.youtube.com/watch?v=DXCbAtkgNMw&amp;referer=');"> D&#8217;oh</a> much like Homer Simpson. Rocks. Windows. I believe the building will soon be in the glass business.</p>
<p>It has been something which when I point this out to people, step by step, they say &#8220;OH WOW&#8221;.  Yea. Tinkle tinkle.<a href="http://www.filmsite.org/dest.html" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.filmsite.org/dest.html?referer=');"> Irony rides again!</a>&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://irv.ourexchange.net/2009/08/irony-rides-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Moments of madness</title>
		<link>http://irv.ourexchange.net/2009/07/moments-of-madness/</link>
		<comments>http://irv.ourexchange.net/2009/07/moments-of-madness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 02:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>redlinedoc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary of the times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bonus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[executive+compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health+insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[other+peoples+money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irv.ourexchange.net/?p=69</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was driving home this evening listening to the discussion about why the financial institutions are putting out the same hybrid products that brought us this wonderful recession, hearing the pundits explain that it brings capital into the markets and although its a bit (a bit?) risky, these instruments help to drive the market. Ok. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was driving home this evening listening to the discussion about why the financial institutions are putting out the same hybrid products that brought us this wonderful recession, hearing the pundits explain that it brings capital into the markets and although its a bit (a bit?) risky, these instruments help to drive the market. Ok. I&#8217;m no financial whiz but didn&#8217;t we just loan billions and trillions of dollars to these self serving financial institutions to NOT have them bet the store? Wasn&#8217;t part of the project to make them more fiscally responsible? Somehow we the poor schmoes who pay taxes are subsidizing a very wealthy gambling habit. We&#8217;re bound to lose. We may be the house but in this case we hold none of the trump cards.</p>
<p>Trump cards? Isn&#8217;t this banking? Isn&#8217;t this where the banker sits across the table and says &#8220;Well Joe, opening a restaurant is a risky business and we&#8217;ll need some collateral&#8221; &#8212; or so it was in the past. Now we have bankers betting (your house) on 10:1 or 100:1 odds knowing that the worst will be that the government will for a time be paying into their bank. Where are their ethics.</p>
<p>Ahh ethics. It seems that capitalism trumps ethics. Do undo others before they do unto you. The Ivory Tower at Havard spoke several weeks ago about plans to include teaching ethics to the business school. Its the piper teaching the cobra. Once the cobra leaves the nest, well then its just a bunch of snakes isn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>It wasn&#8217;t until the sentencing the other week that I got it. Bernie Madoff&#8230;. made off with our monies. Too sweet. such onomatopoeia. No one saw the deal too good to be true, 30:1 winnings? Get real folks. Its all about the casino, and we the taxpayer have been at the largest gaming table ever, Bernie and his friends (and there are more no doubt) are pikers compared to the banks and so called financial houses that take our monies and throw it on the international craps table. Oh lost a few billion in that scheme. Not to worry Uncle will back you. . . .and he has.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://irv.ourexchange.net/2009/07/moments-of-madness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Heads on pikes</title>
		<link>http://irv.ourexchange.net/2009/06/heads-on-pikes/</link>
		<comments>http://irv.ourexchange.net/2009/06/heads-on-pikes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 22:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>redlinedoc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary of the times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bonus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business+ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Danny+DeVito]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[executive+compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General+Motors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman+Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Havard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hewlett+Packard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[other+peoples+money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United+Airlines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irv.ourexchange.net/?p=57</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I've yet to see cat skeleton's around full cat food bowls. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems its a day of good news bad news. The good news seems to be that the boys at Goldman Sachs are snuffling at the trough and ready to suck up those great well deserved bonuses for having put us in the worst recession since the 30&#8242;s perhaps worse than that.  I fear that we missed an opportunity for heads on pikes. I&#8217;m not ordinarily a gory sort of fellow; however, if a few of those egregious folk had their heads up along the boulevard perhaps fewer of these guys would be snorting at the trough so soon. Its a sign that regularion has lost and that we as a nation have or will loose big time now that the game is a foot and the money is liberally flying around again.<br />
It makes me wonder in some ways what the big call is for CEO&#8217;s. I hear one company after another looking for the most expensive CEO guy they can find. I have no problem paying for success. Its the paying for the failures. United Airlines, General Motors, Chrysler, Hewlett Packard &#8212; each of those men and women walked away handsomely endowed with bonus and super bonus and stock options. As each of these companies tanked and drew down the economy we threw MORE money at CEO&#8217;s. I&#8217;ve yet to see cat skeleton&#8217;s around full cat food bowls.  I believe if we all went to reasonable executive pay and said NO MORE! that indeed CEO&#8217;s would be paid proprionately and reasonably. Perhaps we should make the CEO take some of the risk (not with fako securities from the board but with his own monies. Perhaps, as in days of yore, CEO&#8217;s should bear a percentage of risk and win-lose with the company.</p>
<p>Danny DeVito, ever a mirror for the times, did it well with &#8216;Other People&#8217;s Money&#8217;.</p>
<p>The Harvard business school recently announced that they might teach business ethics to their grads. What a concept! Such things as stealing from old ladies is wrong, wiping out the life savings of people and towns is poor for future business, and the future. My son said that if once in a while if the inchoate mob, those who lost nearly everything, had an opportunity to be in a closed area with the hedgies and mutualaholics who ground their savings from real to immaginary numbers that much of this would be object lesson.</p>
<p>But then, that&#8217;s pretty gory.</p>
<p>Heads on pikes. Not a lot. Just a few. Some in Wall Street. Some on K Street. Some along the mall. Sobers the crowd and makes us remember that there really are people who are responsible. Until then, its still &#8220;Buddy can you spare a (discounted) dime.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://irv.ourexchange.net/2009/06/heads-on-pikes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
