Posts Tagged Medicare
Again and again
Posted by redlinedoc in Universal HealthCare on August 13, 2009
Why can’t we pay for health care for everyone? Why is it that is this country we have such a divide? Is it our puritanical upbringing which says work hard and you’ll get your rewards?
Sadly folks, the Puritan’s didn’t have it all that wonderfully. Life was hard but it was short. There were no antibiotics, no x-rays, no casts, no real surgery (with anesthesia). Hospitals were to be avoided as pest houses and physicians themselves at the time knew they did little for their patients. Some cures were probably worse than the diseases.
If we have modernized medicine, why can’t we modernize the way we provide care for our citizens. Why do we in the land of the brave, home of the free, live with a 3rd world medical care system. Sure people come here. The Sultan of Brunei came here and got wonderful care. M. D., a fictional name, in the north end of Hartford got turfed. Hmmm. Would the divide and provision of care have to do with money?
Indeed it does. The wheels grind exceeding slowly for those with limited funding.
You’ve been turfed!
Posted by redlinedoc in Commentary of the times, Medicine, Universal HealthCare on June 21, 2009
More of my patients are being turned away at the gates every day. Often they need advanced care which we at the primary care level can’t give them.
I have always felt that we were most lucky, we are a smallish state and have a training institution and hospital which are owned and operated by the state. This hospital should be seeing the those at the fringe, those in great need. For many years the hospital was located in the center of an immigrant community. In the 70′s it relocated to a suburban location, very upscale. At first there was a bus to take people from the community but that quickly was quashed. Now it takes two busses and a local jitney at the heath centet, about 2.5 hours, to get there. Not much of a barrier.
Patients going to his greater facility of learning often encouter trolls at the gates. Trolls? Admission to this center of ‘much higher learning’ requires the proper insurance, not some of the lower paying kinds that our patient’s possess. When they call, the answer is frequently, call back when you have better insurance.
A few weeks ago, after some harsh notes from our facility, several well dressed physicians show up to try to make arrangements to expedite the admission of our patients into the gleaming tertiary care facility, state owned and supported. To show magnanimity one of the docs takes out a card with driving directions and some special parking near his clinics. There is muffled laughter as we tell him that the majority of our patients don’t drive nor own cars. He’s a bit culturally disconnected.
Lest you think that this is peculiar to the country estate hospital, the in-city institutions answer similarly.
Recently a patient shows on a Friday afternoon, all hunched over, the Groucho Marx walk, right upper quadrant pain, rather classic gallbladder symptoms; a surgical problem. She is referred, complete with small note from the doc, and ambulance transported to the in citty emergeny room to prevent her from having to find transport. The attending physician there concurs but adds the diagnosis ‘shitty insurance’ and instead of wheeling Senora Patient to a holding area for surgical admission, gives her back a note with the names of two surgeons in the area saying she needs urgent and immediate care. She of course calls those offices only to find that neither surgeon participates with her insurance. Quel suprise! Monday morning, quite more hunched over she comes back to our primary care clinic, sicker, with the note and no scar. A nasty note and a phone call, she’s retransported and admitted for care. This is a good outcome?
With all the ballyhoo about insurance companies participating in health care, and contrary to their every present advertisements that ‘they take care of you’ we need remember that there’s a profit motive totally separated from any health provision. The recent squealing and wheezing from the health insurance companies and their paid compadres in government about the death of health care should we use single payor or government sponsored health care is quite self serving, serving only their investors.
The only investors in Medicare are we the users. Its far from perfect. It has a 5-8 percent overhead, unmatched anywhere in the insurance industry, even with draconian plans which provide and income source for the insurance companies not safety nor security for their policy holders.
We need to re-direct our efforts and energies toward providing a comprehensive Medicare type system. A single payor system will insure fairness. I see no reason why the private companies can’t compete for business as they do in every other country with single payors. Lets see them for what they are, trolls at the gates.
it couldn’t hurt .. or could it
Posted by redlinedoc in Commentary, Medicine, Sometimes it works, Universal HealthCare on October 12, 2010
I’ve been watching with interest the current Republican party dance around repeal of the Healthcare insurance legislation just passed. Its a sad bit of badly made political salad with very little for those who need health insurance, a guaranteed business for the insurance companies (universal sign up), guaranteed pharma profits (no pharma negotiation) and extension of the market for about 40% of those who are still uncovered or uninsured.
State legislatures, not to be overlooked are trying their best to carve themselves in our out of the new Heatlhcare bill by blocking advances or by shouting states rights. With hard economic times, its easy to get voters to hear the shouting but miss the salient points.
We’ve missed the boat, again. Smoke and mirrors and distraction reign supreme. The emperor, or his bill, have no clothes. This does not cover a majority of the uninsured. I’m waiting to see how those who are unemployed, now some approaching the 2 year mark, will pay for this bit of fluff. The state’s assistance systems were already at a foundering point and shoving the burden to physicians and hospitals for the under and uninsured will only exacerbate the problem.
There’s a bit of shuck and drag going on here. We’re told that we need to work to pass this. We’re told it will bankrupt us. We’re told this is socialism at its worst. Socialism?
Today one of the walking wounded comes to the clinic. She works 40-50 hours a week, full time she’s told, at one of the local hospitals. To expedite services the hospital contracts out its housekeeping. The firm, to keep profits ripe, they don’t pay insurance. Hmm. Ok. We took what was a paid in-house position, took away the benefits, hired the same folks to do the same job so that the profits would stay as high as maybe ….
I digress. Here’s a full time working person with no insurance. How is a public option for her, socialism? From where I sit, we pay into the medicare system. We pay it in wages and taxes and reap a long term benefit devoid of the need for stockholders to benefit. Although an inconstant fiduciary, generally governments have handled trust funds much better than banks or insurance companies, always looking to the next gaming table, ripening the profits.
If we allow the loud shouts to take back the minimal advances, and I agree its far from perfect, we’ll end up with still more uninsured. The hidden cost of the ‘uninsured’ long patched over by draining high end payments from private insurers into the unbalanced pot is at an end. The insurance blokes, have cut off that avenue. The uninsured now go to emergency rooms, expensive care, and not much of it.
Emphasis from the Healthcare Plan was on primary care, extending to patients the ability to see and to find competent expert medical care. If we persist at deconstructing the fragile imperfect house, we’ll have but a very expensive house of cards fallen loosely and very expensively apart. Threats of Medicare cuts are more thunder than substance. We do need government to help us. Watch carefully.
business+ethics, ethics, fairness, FQHC, Health+insurance, Medicare, other+peoples+money, poor+insurance, poverty, risk, single+payor, underemployed, underinsurance, underinsured, vulnerable, work
No Comments